Label: Not On Label - none • Format: CD Album • Country: US • Genre: Rock •
In softer interpretations, it means the victim receives the [estimated] value of the injury in compensation. The term lex talionis does not always and only refer to literal eye-for-an-eye codes of justice see rather mirror punishment but applies to the broader class of legal systems that specify formulate penalties for specific crimes, which are thought to be fitting in their severity.
Some propose that this was at least in part intended to prevent excessive punishment at the hands of either an avenging private party or the state. Legal codes following the principle of lex talionis have one thing in common: prescribed 'fitting' counter punishment for a felony.
In the famous legal code written by Hammurabithe principle of exact reciprocity is very clearly used. For example, if a person caused the death of another person, the killer would be put to death. The simplest example is the "eye for an eye" principle. In that case, the rule was that punishment must be exactly equal to the crime.
Conversely, the Twelve Tables of Rome merely prescribed particular penalties for particular crimes. The Anglo-Saxon legal code substituted payment of wergild for direct retribution: a particular person's life had a fixed value, derived from his social position; any homicide was compensated by paying the appropriate wergild, regardless of intent.
Under the British Common Law, successful plaintiffs were entitled to repayment equal to their loss in monetary terms. In the modern tort law system, this has been extended to translate non-economic losses into money as well. The meaning of the principle Eye Nothing But The Darkside - Angerfist - Pissin Razorbladez an Eye is that a person who has been injured by another person returns the offending action to Blown Noise - The Kill - Hate Sessions 2000 ~ 2002 originator in compensation, or that an authority does so on behalf of the injured person.
The exact Latin lex talionis to English translation of this phrase is "The law of retaliation. Various ideas regarding the origins of lex talionis exist, but a common one is that it developed as early civilizations grew and a less well-established system for retribution of wrongs, feuds and vendettasthreatened the social fabric.
Despite having been replaced with newer modes of legal theory, lex talionis systems served a critical purpose in the development of social systems—the establishment of a body whose purpose was to enact the retaliation and ensure that this was the only punishment. This body was the state in one of its earliest forms.
The principle is found in Babylonian Law. The retribution might be worse than the crime, perhaps even death. Babylonian law put a limit on such actions, restricting the retribution to be no worse than the crime, as long as victim and offender occupied the same status in society. Roman law moved toward monetary compensation as a substitute for vengeance. In cases of assault, fixed penalties were set for various injuries, although talio was still permitted if one person broke another's limb.
The principle was first referenced in the Code of Hammurabiwhich predates the Hebrew bible. In the Hebrew Law, the "eye for eye" was to restrict compensation to the value of the loss. Thus, it might be better read 'only Eye For An Eye - Beejae - It Was What It Was. eye for one eye'.
Just as another person has received injury from him, so it will be given to him. Isaac Kalimi explains that the "lex talionis was humanized by the Rabbis who interpreted "an eye for an eye" to mean reasonable pecuniary compensation.
As in the case of the Babylonian 'lex talionis', ethical Judaism and humane Jewish jurisprudence replaces the peshat literal meaning of the written Torah. The Talmud  interprets the verses referring to "an eye for an eye" and similar expressions as mandating monetary compensation in tort cases and argues against the interpretations by Sadducees that the Bible verses refer to physical retaliation Faster - Citizen Fish - Millennia Madness (Selected Notes From The Late 20th Century) kind, using the argument that such an interpretation would be inapplicable to blind or eyeless offenders.
Since the Torah requires that penalties be universally applicable, the phrase cannot be interpreted in this manner. The Oral Law explains, based upon the biblical verses, that the Bible mandates a sophisticated five-part monetary form of compensation, consisting of payment for "Damages, Pain, Medical Expenses, Incapacitation, and Mental Anguish" — which underlies many modern legal codes.
Some rabbinic literature explains, moreover, that the expression, "An eye for an eye, etc. However, the Torah also discusses a form of direct reciprocal justicewhere the phrase ayin tachat ayin makes another appearance.
The Torah requires the court to "do to him as he had conspired to do to his brother". Otherwise, the offenders receive lashes. Since there is no form of punishment in the Torah that calls for the maiming of an offender punitary amputation there is no case where a conspiratorial false witness could possibly be punished by the court injuring to his eye, tooth, hand, or foot. There is one case where the Torah states "…and you shall cut off her hand…"  The sages of the Talmud understood the literal meaning of this verse as referring to a case where the woman is attacking a man in potentially lethal manner.
This verse teaches that, although one must intervene to save the victim, one may not kill a lethal attacker if it is possible to neutralize that attacker through non-lethal injury. Numbers —30 discusses the only form of remotely reciprocal justice not carried out directly by the court, where, under very limited circumstances, someone found guilty of negligent manslaughter may be killed by a relative of the deceased who takes on the role of "redeemer of blood".
In such cases, the court requires the guilty party to flee to a designated city of refuge. While the guilty party is there, the "redeemer of blood" may not kill him. If, however, the guilty party illegally forgoes his exile, the "redeemer of blood", as an accessory of the court, may kill the guilty party.
Nevertheless, the provision of the "redeemer of blood" does not serve as true reciprocal justice, because the redeemer only acts to penalize a negligent killer who forgoes his exile.
Furthermore, intentional killing does not parallel negligent killing and thus cannot serve directly as a reciprocal punishment for manslaughter, but as a penalty for escaping punishment. The latter condition is also applicable for any capital punishment.
These circumstances have not existed for approximately 2, years. Eye For An Eye - Beejae - It Was What It Was. Talmud discusses the concept of justice as measure-for-measure retribution middah k'neged middah in the context of divinely implemented justice.
Regarding reciprocal justice by court, however, Good Night Girl - Various - Reconstruqt Torah states that punishments serve to remove La Piedrita - El Experimento De Cuca - Viva Tamaulipas! elements from society "…and you shall eliminate the evil from your midst"  and to deter potential criminals from violating the law "And the rest shall hear and be daunted, and they shall no longer commit anything like this evil deed in your midst" .
Additionally, reciprocal justice in tort cases serves to compensate the victim see above. The ideal of vengeance for the sake of assuaging the distress of the victim plays no role in the Torah's conception of court justice, as victims are cautioned against even hating or bearing a grudge against those who have harmed them. The Torah makes no distinction between whether or not the potential object of hatred or a grudge has been brought to justice, and all people are taught to love their fellow Israelites.
In Exodus 21, as in the Code of Hammurabithe concept of reciprocal justice seemingly applies to social equals; the statement of reciprocal justice "life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe"  is followed by an example of a different law: if a slave-owner blinds the eye or knocks out the tooth of a slave, the slave is freed but the owner pays no other consequence.
On the other hand, the slave would probably be put to death for the injury of the eye of the slave-owner. However the reciprocal justice applies across social boundaries: the "eye for eye" principle is directly followed by the proclamation "You Eye For An Eye - Beejae - It Was What It Was.
to have one law for the alien and the citizen. In this context, the reciprocal justice in an ideal functioning setting, according to Michael Coogan, [ who?
In the Sermon on the MountJesus urges his followers to turn the other cheek :. You have heard that it was said, "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Some interpret this as an admonition not to seek legal steps for any compensation that corresponds in kind and degree to the injury. Christian interpretation of the Biblical passage has been heavily influenced by the Church father Augustine of Hippo. According to Robinson, some have pointed to this passage as evidence of the vengeful nature of justice in the Hebrew Bible.
Lewis points to LamechGideon and Samson as Biblical heroes who were renowned for "their prowess in executing blood revenge upon their public and private enemies. The Qur'an mentions the "eye for an eye" concept as being ordained for the Children of Israel.
But whoever overlooks from his brother anything, then there should be a suitable follow-up and payment to him with good conduct. This is an alleviation from your Lord and a mercy. But whoever transgresses after that will have a painful punishment. In the Torah We prescribed for them a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth, an equal wound for a wound: Eye For An Eye - Beejae - It Was What It Was.
anyone forgoes this out of charity, it will serve as atonement for his bad deeds. Those who do not judge according to what God has revealed are doing grave wrong. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Redirected from Lex talionis. This article is about the principle of retributive justice. For other uses, see Eye for an eye disambiguation and Lex talionis disambiguation. Expression supporting proportional punishment; no more and no less.
See also: Christian views on the old covenant. Main article: Qisas. See also: Leviticus 24 : 19 And if a man cause a blemish in his neighbour; as he hath done, so shall it be done to him; 20 Breach for Lonesome Day - Woody Guthrie - In Memoriam, eye for eye, tooth for tooth: as he hath caused a blemish in a A You You Never Knew - Future Bible Heroes - Memories Of Love, Eternal Youth, And Partygoing (Vinyl, so shall it be done to him again.
Deuteronomy 19 And thine eye shall not pity; but life shall go for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.
The Meaning of the Bible. New York: Harper Collins. Code of Hammurabi BC. Horne Biblical interpretation in Judaism and Christianity. A concise history of Eye For An Eye - Beejae - It Was What It Was. Jewish people. New Eye For An Eye - Beejae - It Was What It Was. Oxford University Press. Essential Judaism: a complete guide to beliefs, customs and rituals. A book Eye For An Eye - Beejae - It Was What It Was.
Jewish ethical concepts: Biblical and postbiblical. Liberal Judaism and social service. The seventy faces of Torah: the Jewish way of reading the Sacred Scriptures. Paulist Press. Retrieved 5 September It is impractical because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for all. The old law of an eye for an eye leaves everyone blind. It is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding Categories : Criminal law English-language idioms Codes of conduct Legal history Law and morality Biblical phrases Islamic terminology Christian terminology Revenge Human eyes in culture.
Hidden categories: Pages with Bible version errors Use American English from January All Wikipedia articles written in American English Articles with short description Use dmy dates from May Articles containing Biblical Hebrew-language text Articles containing Latin-language text All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from February Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history.